| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
checkin touches other files because a function in bk_text.c turned
out to be of more general use so I moved it out into ustring.c.)
[originally from svn r4111]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
from the ground up in Unicode, and a single charset conversion pass
is done over the data as it's output.
[originally from svn r4100]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ustrfroma, utoa_dup and ufroma_dup now take a charset parameter, and
also have a variety of subtly distinct forms. Also, when a \cfg
directive is seen in the input file, the precise octet strings for
each parameter are kept in their original form as well as being
translated into Unicode, so that when they represent filenames they
can be used verbatim.
[originally from svn r4097]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
representable in the output character set.
[originally from svn r4094]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
an enormous amount of preprocessing and differ only in their final
output form, I've introduced a new type of layer called a
`pre-backend' (bk_paper.c is one). This takes all the information
passed to a normal backend and returns an arbitrary void *, which is
cached by the front end and passed on to any backend(s) which state
a desire for the output of that particular pre-backend. Thus, all
the page layout is done only once, and the PS and PDF backends
process the same data structures into two output files.
Note that these backends are _very_ unfinished; all sorts of vital
things such as section numbers, list markers, and title formatting
are missing, the paragraph justification doesn't quite work, and
advanced stuff like indexes and PDF interactive features haven't
even been started. But this basic framework generates valid output
files and is a good starting point, so I'm checking it in.
[originally from svn r4058]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
from its command-line option (`--text=foo.txt') and automatically
convert it into one or more notional \cfg directives. In the HTML
case this mechanism enables single-file mode as well as setting the
filename.
[originally from svn r4018]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
name (or name schema, in HTML).
[originally from svn r4017]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[originally from svn r4016]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the preamble: \copyright paragraphs are now treated identically to
normal paragraphs (so they appear precisely where they're put
instead of in a fixed location), _except_ that the Windows Help
backend also copies their text into the help file's copyright slot.
[originally from svn r4001]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
any ordinary displayable paragraph(s) appearing before the first
chapter heading, meaning in particular that you can put lists, code
paragraphs etc in preambles. Of course, `\preamble' is still
supported for backwards compatibility, but it's now a zero-effect
paragraph marker.
[originally from svn r3981]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[originally from svn r3978]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
features commonly used in man pages: (a) the ability to nest
paragraph breaks, code paragraphs and other lists inside list items,
and (b) description lists as normally used in man pages to describe
command-line options.
[originally from svn r3954]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
complaints, it would probably help if I arranged that those things
had been _allocated_ in all cases, otherwise we merely exchange a
memory leak for a core dump. Duh.
[originally from svn r1916]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
thingy, which seems moderately cool and has reported a few very
small memory leaks. Now apparently fixed.
[originally from svn r1863]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
before the section title (the ": " in "Section 1: Introduction").
[originally from svn r1838]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
failed to be decreased to compensate for the additional indent.
[originally from svn r1834]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[originally from svn r1800]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
near-complete functionality. All that's missing now is indexing and
horizontal rules.
[originally from svn r1449]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
versionids. I thought it might be nice to include only the
versionid(s) from the .but file(s) that gave rise to a particular
chapter file, but actually this is very badly defined (that
information is thrown away very early on in the front end) and in
any case thanks to cross-references every file _does_ depend on its
fellows. Better to put them all in throughout.
[originally from svn r1417]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
like a typographical Bad Plan, but they work OK in some types of
document such as a FAQ.)
[originally from svn r1324]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[originally from svn r828]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[originally from svn r276]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[originally from svn r274]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[originally from svn r248]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
between emphasis _like_ _this_ and _like this_
[originally from svn r245]
|
|
|
[originally from svn r240]
|