From 9a39e46a7bcc6265a4536770382ab3b61ce42084 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Tatham Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 21:38:39 +0000 Subject: Correct a comment. I had wrongly believed my TYPECHECK macro double-evaluated one of its arguments and hence would cause side effects to happen twice. But in fact I've just realised that although it double-_expands_ the argument, it doesn't double-_evaluate_ it: the two expansions occur in mutually exclusive branches of a ?:, and hence cannot both be executed. So I've removed the comment that says my macro is rubbish. My macro is in fact great :-) [originally from svn r9328] [this svn revision also touched charset,filter,timber] --- charset | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/charset b/charset index e1ea12a..1433963 160000 --- a/charset +++ b/charset @@ -1 +1 @@ -Subproject commit e1ea12ac246062e5a78d5b378881fef5117f6697 +Subproject commit 1433963231b098ff6942d67a6c086bb8ab2b8b82 -- cgit v1.1