From 0a93e0f4e52191819069b0a32b5fb051fae7d0da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jacob Nevins Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 21:27:39 +0000 Subject: Fix the behaviour of constructions like \e{index \i{term}} -- the index tag was causing emphasis to be broken (particularly noticeable in text-like backends). There are some instances of this in the PuTTY manual, for instance. Unfortunately, \k references in similar situations still aren't quite right, but fixing that will be more involved, and I haven't found any instances yet. [originally from svn r7049] --- inputs/test.but | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) (limited to 'inputs') diff --git a/inputs/test.but b/inputs/test.but index 3cfc69e..72f8719 100644 --- a/inputs/test.but +++ b/inputs/test.but @@ -256,6 +256,20 @@ An index tag containing non-alternatived Unicode: \i{\u00BFChe?} An invisible index tag: \I{she seems to have an invisible tag}yeah. +An index tag inside another tag: jackdaws love my \e{big \i{sphinx}} +of quartz. + +Similarly, we should support things like hyperlinks +\e{\W{http://www.tartarus.org/}{at the beginning} of emphasised sections}, +and \e{in the \W{http://www.tartarus.org/}{middle} of them}, and also +\e{at the \W{http://home.att.net/~cecw/lastpage.htm}{end}}. + +\#{FIXME: Unfortunately, we still don't quite do the right thing with +references: +How about a \e{reference to \k{subhead} here}? And at +\e{the end: \k{subhead}} and \e{\k{subhead}: the start}? +} + \S2{sub-sub}{Florble} Smaller heading still A tiny section. Awww. How cute. Actually, this one's a \e{florble}, -- cgit v1.1