This refactors all instances of bitwise-ANDs with `~MOD_MASK'. There is
a handful of more complex instances I left unchanged (in cube.c, midend.c,
and twiddle.c), since those AND with `~MOD_MASK | MOD_NUM_KEYPAD' or
similar. I don't think it's worth writing a macro for those cases.

Also document this new macro's usage in devel.but.

This adds an extra parameter to move_cursor() that's an optional pointer
to a bool indicating whether the cursor is visible.  This allows for
centralising the common idiom of having the keyboard cursor become
visible when a cursor key is pressed.  Consistently with the vast
majority of existing puzzles, the cursor moves even if it was invisible
before, and becomes visible even if it can't move.

The function now also returns one of the special constants that can be
returned by interpret_move(), so that the caller can correctly return
MOVE_UI_UPDATE or MOVE_NO_EFFECT without needing to carefully check for
changes itself.

Callers are updated only to the extent that they all pass NULL as the
new argument.  Most of them could now be substantially simplified.

I missed this in my previous addition of preferences for UI controls
(4227ac1fd5dc25c247e7526526079b85e1890766) because it wasn't documented.
Now it is documented and it has a preference.

I've phrased it as showing possible bridge locations, which doesn't
really make clear that "possible" relates only to the locations of
islands and not to anything already placed.  Improvements welcome!

The line was deleted in 5027095ce2a6dd844ce10489c91dc08bbc174a19.

All the other constants named UI_* are special key names that can be
passed to midend_process_key(), but UI_UPDATE is a special return value
from the back-end interpret_move() function instead.  This renaming
makes the distinction clear and provides a naming convention for future
special return values from interpret_move().

These are similar to the existing pair configure() and custom_params()
in that get_prefs() returns an array of config_item describing a set
of dialog-box controls to present to the user, and set_prefs()
receives the same array with answers filled in and implements the
answers. But where configure() and custom_params() operate on a
game_params structure, the new pair operate on a game_ui, and are
intended to permit GUI configuration of all the settings I just moved
into that structure.

However, nothing actually _calls_ these routines yet. All I've done in
this commit is to add them to 'struct game' and implement them for the
functions that need them.

Also, config_item has new fields, permitting each config option to
define a machine-readable identifying keyword as well as the
user-facing description. For options of type C_CHOICES, each choice
also has a keyword. These keyword fields are only defined at all by
the new get_prefs() function - they're left uninitialised in existing
uses of the dialog system. The idea is to use them when writing out
the user's preferences into a configuration file on disk, although I
haven't actually done any of that work in this commit.

I'm about to move some of the bodgy getenv-based options so that they
become fields in game_ui. So these functions, which could previously
access those options directly via getenv, will now need to be given a
game_ui where they can look them up.

This is preparing to separate out the auxiliary functionality, and
perhaps leave space for making more of it in future.

The previous name 'edsf' was too vague: the 'e' stood for 'extended',
and didn't say anything about _how_ it was extended. It's now called a
'flip dsf', since it tracks whether elements in the same class are
flipped relative to each other. More importantly, clients that are
going to use the flip tracking must say so when they allocate the dsf.

And Keen's need to track the minimal element of an equivalence class
is going to become a non-default feature, so there needs to be a new
kind of dsf that specially tracks those, and Keen will have to call it.

While I'm here, I've renamed the three dsf creation functions so that
they start with 'dsf_' like all the rest of the dsf API.

Not very interesting, but the idiom for checking equivalence via two
calls to dsf_canonify is cumbersome enough to be worth abbreviating.