This refactors all instances of bitwise-ANDs with `~MOD_MASK'. There is
a handful of more complex instances I left unchanged (in cube.c, midend.c,
and twiddle.c), since those AND with `~MOD_MASK | MOD_NUM_KEYPAD' or
similar. I don't think it's worth writing a macro for those cases.

Also document this new macro's usage in devel.but.

If you clicked somewhere that had no effect (on an immutable square or
a middle click on an empty square), interpret_move() would return NULL
even though it had unset ui->cursor.  So the keyboard cursor would
remain visible until the next window resize (or similar) when it would
vanish.  Now interpret_move() correctly returns MOVE_UI_UPDATE in
these cases, so the cursor vanishes immediately.

This adds an extra parameter to move_cursor() that's an optional pointer
to a bool indicating whether the cursor is visible.  This allows for
centralising the common idiom of having the keyboard cursor become
visible when a cursor key is pressed.  Consistently with the vast
majority of existing puzzles, the cursor moves even if it was invisible
before, and becomes visible even if it can't move.

The function now also returns one of the special constants that can be
returned by interpret_move(), so that the caller can correctly return
MOVE_UI_UPDATE or MOVE_NO_EFFECT without needing to carefully check for
changes itself.

Callers are updated only to the extent that they all pass NULL as the
new argument.  Most of them could now be substantially simplified.

A test-build with a modern clang points out a number of 'set but not
used' variables, which clang seems to have got better at recently.

In cases where there's conditioned-out or commented-out code using the
variable, I've left it in and added a warning-suppressing cast to
void. Otherwise I've just deleted the variables.

All the other constants named UI_* are special key names that can be
passed to midend_process_key(), but UI_UPDATE is a special return value
from the back-end interpret_move() function instead.  This renaming
makes the distinction clear and provides a naming convention for future
special return values from interpret_move().

These are similar to the existing pair configure() and custom_params()
in that get_prefs() returns an array of config_item describing a set
of dialog-box controls to present to the user, and set_prefs()
receives the same array with answers filled in and implements the
answers. But where configure() and custom_params() operate on a
game_params structure, the new pair operate on a game_ui, and are
intended to permit GUI configuration of all the settings I just moved
into that structure.

However, nothing actually _calls_ these routines yet. All I've done in
this commit is to add them to 'struct game' and implement them for the
functions that need them.

Also, config_item has new fields, permitting each config option to
define a machine-readable identifying keyword as well as the
user-facing description. For options of type C_CHOICES, each choice
also has a keyword. These keyword fields are only defined at all by
the new get_prefs() function - they're left uninitialised in existing
uses of the dialog system. The idea is to use them when writing out
the user's preferences into a configuration file on disk, although I
haven't actually done any of that work in this commit.

I'm about to move some of the bodgy getenv-based options so that they
become fields in game_ui. So these functions, which could previously
access those options directly via getenv, will now need to be given a
game_ui where they can look them up.

The majority of back-ends define encode_ui() to return NULL and
decode_ui() to do nothing.  This commit allows them to instead specify
the relevant function pointers as NULL, in which case the mid-end won't
try to call them.

I'm planning to add a parameter to decode_ui(), and if I'm going to have
to touch every back-end's version of decode_ui(), I may as well ensure
that most of them never need to be touched again.  And obviously
encode_ui() should go the same way for symmetry.