<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>rockbox/utils/nwztools/plattools/data, branch master</title>
<subtitle>My Rockbox tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://www.franklinwei.com/cgit/rockbox/'/>
<entry>
<title>nwztools: rework dualboot</title>
<updated>2016-11-12T21:16:48+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Amaury Pouly</name>
<email>amaury.pouly@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-11-12T21:16:48+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://www.franklinwei.com/cgit/rockbox/commit/?id=0c1a96101cdfc778dbffa7ceffea5765ffd4d1bd'/>
<id>0c1a96101cdfc778dbffa7ceffea5765ffd4d1bd</id>
<content type='text'>
The new code gets closer to an actual bootloader:
- it provides a menu with three options: Sony, Rockox, tools with icons (and
  extracts the Sony logo from the NVP)
- the dualboot install script now creates a symlink from /.rockbox to
  /contents/.rockox which is necessary to run rockbox
- more text drawing / framebuffer functions
In the long run, we will move this under bootloader/ and rbutil/ and also use
firmware/ drawing facilities, at the moment we use OF display program which
is slow and creates some flickering.
The logo extraction/placement code was tested with resolution 240x320 and I
guessed some reasonable values for 240x400, but those will probably need some
tweaking.

Change-Id: I0319be902d21a7d33c1dee0fffdb4797065dbf8a
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The new code gets closer to an actual bootloader:
- it provides a menu with three options: Sony, Rockox, tools with icons (and
  extracts the Sony logo from the NVP)
- the dualboot install script now creates a symlink from /.rockbox to
  /contents/.rockox which is necessary to run rockbox
- more text drawing / framebuffer functions
In the long run, we will move this under bootloader/ and rbutil/ and also use
firmware/ drawing facilities, at the moment we use OF display program which
is slow and creates some flickering.
The logo extraction/placement code was tested with resolution 240x320 and I
guessed some reasonable values for 240x400, but those will probably need some
tweaking.

Change-Id: I0319be902d21a7d33c1dee0fffdb4797065dbf8a
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
