| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The 'breaks' and 'aux' fields were filled in rather inconsistently at
various places where a word is created - especially the outlying ones
that manufacture pieces of document during internal processing of
contents, index, bibliography, cross-references etc rather than
directly from the input file. This has never led to any user-visible
behaviour change that I've noticed, but it made a lot of annoying
noise in the valgrind output, which got in my way last week when I was
trying to debug the CHM generation.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm not quite sure why I ever thought it was a good idea to have a
central variadic error() function taking an integer error code
followed by some list of arguments that depend on that code. It now
seems obvious to me that it's a much more sensible idea to have a
separate function per error, so that we can check at compile time that
the arguments to each error call are of the right number and type! So
I've done that instead.
A side effect is that the errors are no longer formatted into a
fixed-size buffer before going to stderr, so I can remove all the
%.200s precautions in the format strings.
[originally from svn r9639]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(mknew/mknewa/resize) to the PuTTY ones (snew/snewn/sresize). snewn
and mknewa have their arguments opposite ways round; this may make
the change initially painful but in the long term will free me of a
nasty context switch every time I move between codebases. Also
sresize takes an explicit type operand which is used to cast the
return value from realloc, thus enforcing that it must be correct,
and arranging that if anyone tries to compile Halibut with a C++
compiler there should be a lot less pain.
[originally from svn r4276]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
not break the numbering of the outer one!
[originally from svn r3955]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[originally from svn r1800]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
heapsort. This makes the code much simpler for a start, but the main
reason is so that we can spot duplicate keywords as we go along
rather than having to wait until the end of input processing.
[originally from svn r1489]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
near-complete functionality. All that's missing now is indexing and
horizontal rules.
[originally from svn r1449]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`question' or so on, using the syntax
\S{mysection}{example} An example of foobar
so that in cross-references it will be referred to as `example
5.1.2' instead of `section 5.1.2'. NOTE WELL: until now Buttress has
supported multiple section keywords using the same syntax, so that
you could xref the above section as \k{mysection} _or_ \k{example}
with the same effect. This behaviour is now revoked because I don't
think anyone was using it; if you suddenly find you're getting
undefined-keyword errors this may be why.
[originally from svn r1408]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixed again.
[originally from svn r1330]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
user doesn't skip a heading level (\H before any \C or \A, or \S
straight after \C with no intervening \H). The precise criterion is
that when creating section a.b.c.d, sections a.b.c, a.b and a should
already exist. This ensures the section tree really is a properly
formed tree with no missing nodes.
[originally from svn r1329]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[originally from svn r275]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[originally from svn r240]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[originally from svn r238]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[originally from svn r237]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[originally from svn r214]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[originally from svn r200]
|
|
|
[originally from svn r193]
|
