| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new generator works on the same 'combinatorial coordinates' system
as the more recently written Hats and Spectre generators.
When I came up with that technique for the Hats tiling, I was already
tempted to rewrite the Penrose generator on the same principle,
because it has a lot of advantages over the previous technique of
picking a randomly selected patch out of the subdivision of a huge
starting tile. It generates the exact limiting distribution of
possible tiling patches rather than an approximation based on how big
a tile you subdivided; it doesn't use any overly large integers or
overly precise floating point to suffer overflow or significance loss,
because it never has to even _think_ about the coordinates of any
point not in the actual output area.
But I resisted the temptation to throw out our existing Penrose
generator and move to the shiny new algorithm, for just one reason:
backwards compatibility. There's no sensible way to translate existing
Loopy game IDs into the new notation, so they would stop working,
unless we kept the old generator around as well to interpret the
previous system. And although _random seeds_ aren't guaranteed to
generate the same result from one build of Puzzles to the next, I do
try to keep existing descriptive game IDs working.
So if we had to keep the old generator around anyway, it didn't seem
worth writing a new one...
... at least, until we discovered that the old generator has a latent
bug. The function that decides whether each tile is within the target
area, and hence whether to make it part of the output grid, is based
on floating-point calculation of the tile's vertices. So a change in
FP rounding behaviour between two platforms could cause them to
interpret the same grid description differently, invalidating a Loopy
game on that grid. This is _unlikely_, as long as everyone uses IEEE
754 double, but the C standard doesn't actually guarantee that.
We found this out when I started investigating a slight distortion in
large instances of Penrose Loopy. For example, the Loopy random seed
"40x40t11#12345", as of just before this commit, generates a game
description beginning with the Penrose grid string "G-4944,5110,108",
in which you can see a star shape of five darts a few tiles down the
left edge, where two of the radii of the star don't properly line up
with edges in the surrounding shell of kites that they should be
collinear with. This turns out to be due to FP error: not because
_double precision_ ran out, but because the definitions of COS54,
SIN54, COS18 and SIN18 in penrose.c were specified to only 7 digits of
precision. And when you expand a patch of tiling that large, you end
up with integer combinations of those numbers with coefficients about
7 digits long, mostly cancelling out to leave a much smaller output
value, and the inaccuracies in those constants start to be noticeable.
But having noticed that, it then became clear that these badly
computed values were also critical to _correctness_ of the grid. So
they can't be fixed without invalidating old game IDs. _And_ then we
realised that this also means existing platforms might disagree on a
game ID's validity.
So if we have to break compatibility anyway, we should go all the way,
and instead of fixing the old system, introduce the shiny new system
that gets all of this right. Therefore, the new penrose.c uses the
more reliable combinatorial-coordinates system which doesn't deal in
integers that large in the first place. Also, there's no longer any
floating point at all in the calculation of tile vertex coordinates:
the combinations of 1 and sqrt(5) are computed exactly by the
n_times_root_k function. So now a large Penrose grid should never have
obvious failures of alignment like that.
The old system is kept for backwards compatibility. It's not fully
reliable, because that bug hasn't been fixed - but any Penrose Loopy
game ID that was working before on _some_ platform should still work
on that one. However, new Penrose Loopy game IDs are based on
combinatorial coordinates, computed in exact arithmetic, and should be
properly stable.
The new code looks suspiciously like the Spectre code (though
considerably simpler - the Penrose coordinate maps are easy enough
that I just hand-typed them rather than having an elaborate auxiliary
data-generation tool). That's because they were similar enough in
concept to make it possible to clone and hack. But there are enough
divergences that it didn't seem like a good idea to try to merge them
again afterwards - in particular, the fact that output Penrose tiles
are generated by merging two triangular metatiles while Spectres are
subdivisions of their metatiles.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
4-vector representation, rather than mucking about with sines and
cosines after grid generation. _Should_ make no difference in the
generated grids (there's a theoretical risk of an unlucky rounding
error just about managing to push some point in or out of bounds, but
I think it's vanishingly small), but simplifies the coordinate-
flattening procedure, and in particular increases its chance of
getting vertical lines actually vertical.
(Prior to this change, the game ID
10x10t12:G2554,-31,108_a3b12h0a212a3d102b2a23a2e3b01b0a2c2a0c0 was
generating a not-quite-vertical edge at top left, in the Java port but
not on Linux; I suspect differences in sin and cos as the cause of the
discrepancy. With the rotation done like this, the points'
x-coordinates are now computed without reference to their
y-coordinates.)
[originally from svn r9168]
|
