summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--www/docs/FAQ13
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/www/docs/FAQ b/www/docs/FAQ
index ee30698..9e72a8f 100644
--- a/www/docs/FAQ
+++ b/www/docs/FAQ
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
Copyright (C) 2002 by Robert E. Hak
---------------------------------------------------------------------
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
Rockbox FAQ
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ A29: Don't confuse the terms. Reverse engineering means examining a product
software without first researching the surrounding interfaces, then no
software has ever been written from scratch.
-Q30: Wait a minute here. You have release version 1.0, but not a single one
+Q30: Wait a minute here. You have released version 1.0, but not a single one
of the ideas you have spoken about is actually implimented! Calling this
version 1.0 is really misleading. Whats the story?!
A30: In simple terms, the first release is called 1.0 because it has a basic
@@ -244,3 +244,12 @@ A30: In simple terms, the first release is called 1.0 because it has a basic
bring the project some attention, and some additional developers.
Adding the missing features is just a matter of time (and that time goes
faster if you, yes you, help too).
+
+Q31: I've heard talk of a 'Rolo'. What is that? (Or 'All you ever wanted
+ to know about Rockbox boot loaders')
+A31: The developers have discussed the possibility of a boot loader. (Mainly
+ because having one sounds cool, and isn't Rolo just a great name?)
+ The idea would be that a user could use the load to choose between
+ different verions of Rockbox or the Archo firmware itself. We do not
+ have an expected date on this. (As a matter of fact, developement on it
+ has not even started yet).