| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new generator works on the same 'combinatorial coordinates' system
as the more recently written Hats and Spectre generators.
When I came up with that technique for the Hats tiling, I was already
tempted to rewrite the Penrose generator on the same principle,
because it has a lot of advantages over the previous technique of
picking a randomly selected patch out of the subdivision of a huge
starting tile. It generates the exact limiting distribution of
possible tiling patches rather than an approximation based on how big
a tile you subdivided; it doesn't use any overly large integers or
overly precise floating point to suffer overflow or significance loss,
because it never has to even _think_ about the coordinates of any
point not in the actual output area.
But I resisted the temptation to throw out our existing Penrose
generator and move to the shiny new algorithm, for just one reason:
backwards compatibility. There's no sensible way to translate existing
Loopy game IDs into the new notation, so they would stop working,
unless we kept the old generator around as well to interpret the
previous system. And although _random seeds_ aren't guaranteed to
generate the same result from one build of Puzzles to the next, I do
try to keep existing descriptive game IDs working.
So if we had to keep the old generator around anyway, it didn't seem
worth writing a new one...
... at least, until we discovered that the old generator has a latent
bug. The function that decides whether each tile is within the target
area, and hence whether to make it part of the output grid, is based
on floating-point calculation of the tile's vertices. So a change in
FP rounding behaviour between two platforms could cause them to
interpret the same grid description differently, invalidating a Loopy
game on that grid. This is _unlikely_, as long as everyone uses IEEE
754 double, but the C standard doesn't actually guarantee that.
We found this out when I started investigating a slight distortion in
large instances of Penrose Loopy. For example, the Loopy random seed
"40x40t11#12345", as of just before this commit, generates a game
description beginning with the Penrose grid string "G-4944,5110,108",
in which you can see a star shape of five darts a few tiles down the
left edge, where two of the radii of the star don't properly line up
with edges in the surrounding shell of kites that they should be
collinear with. This turns out to be due to FP error: not because
_double precision_ ran out, but because the definitions of COS54,
SIN54, COS18 and SIN18 in penrose.c were specified to only 7 digits of
precision. And when you expand a patch of tiling that large, you end
up with integer combinations of those numbers with coefficients about
7 digits long, mostly cancelling out to leave a much smaller output
value, and the inaccuracies in those constants start to be noticeable.
But having noticed that, it then became clear that these badly
computed values were also critical to _correctness_ of the grid. So
they can't be fixed without invalidating old game IDs. _And_ then we
realised that this also means existing platforms might disagree on a
game ID's validity.
So if we have to break compatibility anyway, we should go all the way,
and instead of fixing the old system, introduce the shiny new system
that gets all of this right. Therefore, the new penrose.c uses the
more reliable combinatorial-coordinates system which doesn't deal in
integers that large in the first place. Also, there's no longer any
floating point at all in the calculation of tile vertex coordinates:
the combinations of 1 and sqrt(5) are computed exactly by the
n_times_root_k function. So now a large Penrose grid should never have
obvious failures of alignment like that.
The old system is kept for backwards compatibility. It's not fully
reliable, because that bug hasn't been fixed - but any Penrose Loopy
game ID that was working before on _some_ platform should still work
on that one. However, new Penrose Loopy game IDs are based on
combinatorial coordinates, computed in exact arithmetic, and should be
properly stable.
The new code looks suspiciously like the Spectre code (though
considerably simpler - the Penrose coordinate maps are easy enough
that I just hand-typed them rather than having an elaborate auxiliary
data-generation tool). That's because they were similar enough in
concept to make it possible to clone and hack. But there are enough
divergences that it didn't seem like a good idea to try to merge them
again afterwards - in particular, the fact that output Penrose tiles
are generated by merging two triangular metatiles while Spectres are
subdivisions of their metatiles.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In commit 8d6647548f7d005 I added the Hats grid type to Loopy, and
mentioned in the commit message that I was very pleased with the
algorithm I came up with.
In fact, I was so pleased with it that I've decided it deserves a
proper public writeup. So I've spent the Easter weekend producing one:
https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/quasiblog/aperiodic-tilings/
In this commit I adjust the header comments in both penrose.c and
hat.c to refer to the article (replacing a previous comment in
penrose.c to a much less polished page containing a copy of my
jotting-grade personal notes that I sent James Harvey once). Also,
added some code to hatgen.c to output Python hat descriptions in a
similar style to hat-test, which I used to generate a couple of the
more difficult diagrams in the new article, and didn't want to lose.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a build failure introduced by commit 2e48ce132e011e8
yesterday.
When I saw that commit I expected the most likely problem would be in
the NestedVM build, which is currently the thing with the most most
out-of-date C implementation. And indeed the NestedVM toolchain
doesn't have <tgmath.h> - but much more surprisingly, our _Windows_
builds failed too, with a compile error inside <tgmath.h> itself!
I haven't looked closely into the problem yet. Our Windows builds are
done with clang, which comes with its own <tgmath.h> superseding the
standard Windows one. So you'd _hope_ that clang could make sense of
its own header! But perhaps the problem is that this is an unusual
compile mode and hasn't been tested.
My fix is to simply add a cmake check for <tgmath.h> - which doesn't
just check the file's existence, it actually tries compiling a file
that #includes it, so it will detect 'file exists but is mysteriously
broken' just as easily as 'not there at all'. So this makes the builds
start working again, precisely on Ben's theory of opportunistically
using <tgmath.h> where possible and falling back to <math.h>
otherwise.
It looks ugly, though! I'm half tempted to make a new header file
whose job is to include a standard set of system headers, just so that
that nasty #ifdef doesn't have to sit at the top of almost all the
source files. But for the moment this at least gets the build working
again.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
C89 provided only double-precision mathematical functions (sin() etc),
and so despite using single-precision elsewhere, those are what Puzzles
has traditionally used. C99 introduced single-precision equivalents
(sinf() etc), and I hope it's been long enough that we can safely use
them. Maybe they'll even be faster.
Rather than directly use the single-precision functions, though, we use
the magic macros from <tgmath.h> that automatically choose the precision
of mathematical functions based on their arguments. This has the
advantage that we only need to change which header we include, and thus
that we can switch back again if some platform has trouble with the new
header.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Nothing uses it, and that's not surprising, because if anything had,
we'd have noticed that it never actually got written!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Having stated the principle in the previous commit, I should apply it
consistently. A source file linked into the Puzzles library of common
support code should not also define a main() under ifdef.
This commit only goes as far as the _library_ support modules. It
would be a much bigger job to do the same for all the actual _puzzles_
that have test main()s or standalone-solver main()s. And it's not
necessary, because modifying one of those source files only triggers a
rebuild of _one_ puzzle, not absolutely everything. (Not to mention
that it's quite likely the puzzle and the test main() will need to be
modified in conjunction anyway.)
As in the previous commit, this has required exposing a few internal
API functions as global, and maybe editing them a bit. In particular,
the one-shot internal function that divvy_rectangle() loops on until
it succeeds is now exposed as divvy_rectangle_attempt(), which means
the test program doesn't have to condition a failure counter into the
real function.
I've thrown away penrose-vector-test completely, because that didn't
look like a test program with any ongoing use at all - it was surely
vestigial, while James was getting the vector representation up and
running in the first place.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After Ben fixed all the unwanted global functions by using gcc's
-Wmissing-declarations to spot any that were not predeclared, I
remembered that clang has -Wmissing-variable-declarations, which does
the same job for global objects. Enabled it in -DSTRICT=ON, and made
the code clean under it.
Mostly this was just a matter of sticking 'static' on the front of
things. One variable was outright removed ('verbose' in signpost.c)
because after I made it static clang was then able to spot that it was
also unused.
The more interesting cases were the ones where declarations had to be
_added_ to header files. In particular, in COMBINED builds, puzzles.h
now arranges to have predeclared each 'game' structure defined by a
puzzle backend. Also there's a new tiny header file gtk.h, containing
the declarations of xpm_icons and n_xpm_icons which are exported by
each puzzle's autogenerated icon source file and by no-icon.c. Happily
even the real XPM icon files were generated by our own Perl script
rather than being raw xpm output from ImageMagick, so there was no
difficulty adding the corresponding #include in there.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I noticed commit db3b531e2cab765a00475054d2e9046c9d0437d3 in the history
where Simon added a bunch of "static" qualifiers. That suggested that
consistently marking internal functions "static" is desirable, so I
tried a build using GCC's -Wmissing-declarations, which requires prior
declaration (presumed to be in a header file) of all global functions.
This commit makes the GTK build clean under GCC's
-Wmissing-declarations. I've also adding "static" to a few obviously
internal objects, but GCC doesn't complain about those so I certainly
haven't got them all.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Most of these aren't especially useful, but if we're going to have
them in the code base at all, we should at least ensure they compile:
bit-rotted conditioned-out code is of no value.
One of the new programs is 'galaxieseditor', which borrows most of the
Galaxies code but changes the UI so that you can create and remove
_dots_ instead of edges, and then run the solver to see whether it can
solve the puzzle you've designed. Unlike the rest, this is a GUI
helper tool, using the 'guiprogram' cmake function introduced in the
previous commit.
The programs are:
- 'combi', a test program for the utility module that generates all
combinations of n things
- 'divvy', a test program for the module that divides a rectangle at
random into equally-sized polyominoes
- 'penrose-test', a test program for the Penrose-tiling generator
used in Loopy, which outputs an SVG of a piece of tiling
- 'penrose-vector', a much smaller test program for the vector
arithmetic subroutines in that code
- 'sort-test', a test of this code base's local array sorting routine
- 'tree234-test', the exhaustive test code that's been in tree234.c
all along.
Not all of them compiled first time. Most of the fixes were the usual
kind of thing: fixing compiler warnings by removing unused
variables/functions, bringing uses of internal APIs up to date. A
notable one was that galaxieseditor's interpret_move() modified the
input game state, which was an error all along and is now detected by
me having made it a const pointer; I had to replace that with an extra
wrinkle in the move-string format, so that now execute_move() makes
the modification.
The one I'm _least_ proud of is squelching a huge number of
format-string warnings in tree234-test by interposing a variadic
function without __attribute__((printf)).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
4-vector representation, rather than mucking about with sines and
cosines after grid generation. _Should_ make no difference in the
generated grids (there's a theoretical risk of an unlucky rounding
error just about managing to push some point in or out of bounds, but
I think it's vanishingly small), but simplifies the coordinate-
flattening procedure, and in particular increases its chance of
getting vertical lines actually vertical.
(Prior to this change, the game ID
10x10t12:G2554,-31,108_a3b12h0a212a3d102b2a23a2e3b01b0a2c2a0c0 was
generating a not-quite-vertical edge at top left, in the Java port but
not on Linux; I suspect differences in sin and cos as the cause of the
discrepancy. With the rotation done like this, the points'
x-coordinates are now computed without reference to their
y-coordinates.)
[originally from svn r9168]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
additions of missing 'static' and explicit 'void' in parameter lists,
plus one or two other things like explicitly casting chars in variadic
argument lists to int and using DBL_MAX if HUGE_VAL isn't available.
[originally from svn r9166]
|
|
|
to add two kinds of Penrose tiling to the grid types supported by
Loopy.
This has involved a certain amount of infrastructure work, because of
course the whole point of Penrose tilings is that they don't have to
be the same every time: so now grid.c has grown the capacity to
describe its grids as strings, and reconstitute them from those string
descriptions. Hence a Penrose Loopy game description consists of a
string identifying a particular piece of Penrose tiling, followed by
the normal Loopy clue encoding.
All the existing grid types decline to provide a grid description
string, so their Loopy game descriptions have not changed encoding.
[originally from svn r9159]
|
